Current Situation and Development of Environmental Geophysics-OAJRC Applied Physics-Pubscie

Views: 187 ES Score: 0 Introduced Quantity:

Current Situation and Development of Environmental Geophysics

DOI: 10.26855/oajrcap.2022.12.001
Year, volume (issue): 2022, 4(1)
pp. 1-4
Published in: OAJRC Applied Physics
Fund Project

Relevant scholars

Relevant institutions

S. Abdullaev

Environment, subway physics, status quo, development

Full text Download Quote Collection

Abstract

In the era of continuous advancement of science and technology, both environmental protection biology and geophysics have had a great impact, especially the increasing influence of geophysics on environmental research, and this process has also led to a new type of science and technology The emergence of environmental protection geophysics. The emergence of environmental geophysics did not happen overnight. It appeared as early as at home and abroad. Around 1970, environmental geophysics had already received attention. Since 1985, environmental geophysics has been regarded as a relatively independent science.

Keywords: Environment, subway physics, status quo, development

Reference
Related literature

[1] Kura N U, Ramli M F, Sulaiman W N A, et al. An overview of groundwater chemistry studies in Malaysia[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2018, 25(8): 7231-7249.

[2] Gopinath S, Srinivasamoorthy K, Saravanan K, et al. Discriminating groundwater salinization processes in coastal aquifers of southeastern India: geophysical, hydrogeochemical and numerical modeling approach[J]. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2019, 21(5): 2443-2458.

[3] Jeong J S, Ramírez-Gómez Á. Optimizing the location of a biomass plant with a fuzzy-DEcision-MAking Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (F-DEMATEL) and multi-criteria spatial decision assessment for renewable energy management and long-term sustainability[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 182: 509-520.

[4] Jeong J S, Ramírez-Gómez Á. Optimizing the location of a biomass plant with a fuzzy-DEcision-MAking Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (F-DEMATEL) and multi-criteria spatial decision assessment for renewable energy management and long-term sustainability[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 182: 509-520.

[5] East A E, Sankey J B. Geomorphic and sedimentary effects of modern climate change: Current and anticipated future conditions in the western United States[J]. Reviews of Geophysics, 2020, 58(4): e2019RG000692.

[6] Whiteley J S, Chambers J E, Uhlemann S, et al. Geophysical monitoring of moisture‐induced landslides: a review[J]. Reviews of Geophysics, 2019, 57(1): 106-145.

[7] Barboza F M, Medeiros W E, Santana J M. A user-driven feedback approach for 2D direct current resistivity inversion based on particle swarm optimizationFeedback inversion using PSO[J]. Geophysics, 2019, 84(2): E105-E124.

[8] Dai C, Higman B, Lynett P J, et al. Detection and assessment of a large and potentially tsunamigenic periglacial landslide in Barry Arm, Alaska[J]. Geophysical research letters, 2020, 47(22): e2020GL089800.

[9] Anomohanran O, Ofomola M O, Okocha F O. Investigation of groundwater in parts of Ndokwa district in Nigeria using geo-physical logging and electrical resistivity methods: implications for groundwater exploration[J]. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 2017, 129: 108-116.

[10] Zhigang T, Chun Z, Manchao H, et al. Research on the safe mining depth of anti-dip bedding slope in Changshanhao Mine[J]. Geomechanics and Geophysics for Geo-Energy and Geo-Resources, 2020, 6(2): 1-20.

Relevant scholars

Relevant institutions

Abstract

Comments